- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 40E vs Galaxy M62
Huawei Mate 40E vs Samsung Galaxy M62
What Mate 40E does better (14) and where Galaxy M62 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display5.2
8.3Camera7.5
5.7Battery8.0
6.3Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 40EGalaxy M62
| Mate 40E | Galaxy M62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 163.9 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 76.3 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 218 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 40E better than Galaxy M62?
- Wired charging40 W vs 25 W+60%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy M62: No
- 5GYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Weight188 g vs 218 g+16%
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 2.73 GHz+5%
- Pixel density402 ppi vs 393 ppi+2%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 9.5 mm+8%
Why is Galaxy M62 better than Mate 40E?
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+67%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Silver, White, Black | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990E 5G | Exynos 9825 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Exynos |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.73 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP14 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco F3vsSamsung Galaxy M62
7.47.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsRealme GT Master
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Poco X3 GT
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
7.27.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsOPPO Reno6 5G
7.27.1


