- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 90m Plus vs Xever 8
Huawei Enjoy 90m Plus vs RugOne Xever 8
What Enjoy 90m Plus does better (13) and where Xever 8 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display6.0
5.5Camera6.4
8.4Battery3.2
4.2Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 90m PlusXever 8
| Enjoy 90m Plus | Xever 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 168 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 80 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 14 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 320 g | −108 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 90m Plus better than Xever 8?
- Wired charging40 W vs 18 W2.2×
- Battery capacity6,620 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+38%
- Weight212 g vs 320 g+51%
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 680 nits+25%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Xever 8: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 14 mm+69%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.2+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 75.9%+11%
Why is Xever 8 better than Enjoy 90m Plus?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- NFCNo · Enjoy 90m Plus: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Enjoy 90m Plus: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 405 ppi+53%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 90m Plus: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- eSIMNo · Enjoy 90m Plus: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Enjoy 90m Plus: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, White, Orange | Black, Sand Dune |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 680 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 75.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,620 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
