- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs V80 Pro
Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs ZTE V80 Pro
What Enjoy 90 Pro Max does better (14) and where V80 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display6.8
5.5Camera6.2
8.8Battery5.2
8.3Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 90 Pro MaxV80 Pro
| Enjoy 90 Pro Max | V80 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 166 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 79 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 195 g | +37 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 90 Pro Max better than V80 Pro?
- Battery capacity8,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+70%
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,000 nits4×
- Wired charging40 W vs 22 W+78%
- OLED panelYes · V80 Pro: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · V80 Pro: No
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 317 ppi+40%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · V80 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 900 px+41%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
Why is V80 Pro better than Enjoy 90 Pro Max?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 90 Pro Max: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight232 g vs 195 g+19%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.7 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 79 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Gold | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 900 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,756 px | 1,940 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 317 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 85.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | Unisoc T7280 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Unisoc |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mail G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 804,373 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,558 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 22 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
