- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs nubia Neo 5 Pro
Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro
What Enjoy 90 Pro Max does better (9) and where nubia Neo 5 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display8.6
5.5Camera6.1
8.8Battery8.9
8.3Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 90 Pro Maxnubia Neo 5 Pro
| Enjoy 90 Pro Max | nubia Neo 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 166.1 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 210 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 90 Pro Max better than nubia Neo 5 Pro?
- Battery capacity8,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+42%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- 4K selfie videoYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 387 ppi+15%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,080 px+18%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.2% vs 85.3%+6%
Why is nubia Neo 5 Pro better than Enjoy 90 Pro Max?
- Wired charging40 W vs 80 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- eSIMNo · Enjoy 90 Pro Max: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+13%
- Weight232 g vs 210 g+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Gold | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,756 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 85.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | Unisoc T9100 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Unisoc |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 804,373 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,558 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | MyOS 16 |
