How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs Poco M8

Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Poco M8

What Enjoy 90 Pro Max does better (8) and where Poco M8 wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max
Huawei · 2026Enjoy 90 Pro Max
8.4Score
8 advantages≈ $240
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8
Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8
8.0Score
9 advantages≈ $250
9.5Display8.5
5.5Performance5.5
5.5Camera6.3
8.8Battery7.6
8.3Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enjoy 90 Pro MaxPoco M8
78 × 163.3875.4 × 1647.4
Enjoy 90 Pro MaxPoco M8Difference
Height163.3 mm164 mm−0.7 mm
Width78 mm75.4 mm+2.6 mm
Thickness8 mm7.4 mm+0.6 mm
Weight232 g178 g+54 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enjoy 90 Pro Max better than Poco M8?

  1. Battery capacity8,500 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+54%
  2. AnTuTu score804,373 vs 631,693+27%
  3. Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+25%
  4. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco M8: No
  5. Pixel density444 ppi vs 388 ppi+14%
  6. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
  7. Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,080 px+18%
  8. Bluetooth6 vs 5.1+18%

Why is Poco M8 better than Enjoy 90 Pro Max?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,558 vs 2,898+13%
  2. Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
  3. Selfie camera8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  4. Weight232 g vs 178 g+30%
  5. Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 90 Pro Max: Yes
  6. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx6+20%
  7. Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
  8. Thickness8 mm vs 7.4 mm+8%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco M8Xiaomi Poco M8≈ $2508.0
Design
Weight232 g178 g
Thickness8 mm7.4 mm
Height163.3 mm164 mm
Width78 mm75.4 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackAluminiumPlastic
Ingress protectionIP65IP66
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx6
Glass protectionAluminosilicate glass—
ColoursBlack, White, Blue, GoldBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,272 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,756 px2,392 px
Pixel density444 ppi388 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,473 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.2%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetKirin 8000Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process7 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G610 MP4Adreno 710
AnTuTu score804,373631,693
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,5582,898
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—866
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/2.88"
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera8 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,500 mAh5,520 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—13.9 h
Wired charging40 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—55%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth65.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchHarmonyOS 6.0Android 15
PlatformHarmonyOSAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—50 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare