- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs Poco C95 Pro
Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro
What Enjoy 90 Pro Max does better (16) and where Poco C95 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display6.4
5.5Camera4.6
8.8Battery8.9
8.3Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 90 Pro MaxPoco C95 Pro
| Enjoy 90 Pro Max | Poco C95 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 170.1 mm | −6.8 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 232 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 90 Pro Max better than Poco C95 Pro?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 825 nits4.8×
- OLED panelYes · Poco C95 Pro: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Poco C95 Pro: No
- Battery capacity8,500 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+13%
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 254 ppi+75%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco C95 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 720 px+77%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
Why is Poco C95 Pro better than Enjoy 90 Pro Max?
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 90 Pro Max: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Enjoy 90 Pro Max: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 170.1 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Gold | Green, Blue, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,756 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 825 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 86.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 804,373 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,558 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,500 mAh | 7,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
