- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs iQOO Z11x (China)
Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)
What Enjoy 90 Pro Max does better (10) and where iQOO Z11x (China) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display7.1
5.5Performance7.0
5.5Camera5.5
8.8Battery8.7
8.3Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 90 Pro MaxiQOO Z11x (China)
| Enjoy 90 Pro Max | iQOO Z11x (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 166.6 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 219 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 90 Pro Max better than iQOO Z11x (China)?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,200 nits3.3×
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
- Battery capacity8,500 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+18%
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 382 ppi+16%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,080 px+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.2% vs 85.8%+5%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.4 mm+5%
Why is iQOO Z11x (China) better than Enjoy 90 Pro Max?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- AnTuTu score804,373 vs 983,562+22%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,558 vs 2,988+17%
- Wired charging40 W vs 44 W+10%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- Weight232 g vs 219 g+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Gold | Black, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,756 px | 2,344 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 85.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 804,373 | 983,562 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,558 | 2,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.93" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,500 mAh | 7,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 35% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 6 |
