- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs Galaxy A07
Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy A07
What Enjoy 90 Pro Max does better (21) and where Galaxy A07 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display5.8
5.5Performance4.0
5.5Camera4.6
8.8Battery7.5
8.3Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 90 Pro MaxGalaxy A07
| Enjoy 90 Pro Max | Galaxy A07 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 167.4 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 199 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 90 Pro Max better than Galaxy A07?
- AnTuTu score804,373 vs 509,611+58%
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 800 nits5×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Battery capacity8,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+42%
- Wired charging40 W vs 25 W+60%
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy A07: No
- NFCYes · Galaxy A07: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A07: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 262 ppi+69%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,558 vs 2,029+26%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is Galaxy A07 better than Enjoy 90 Pro Max?
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 90 Pro Max: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Enjoy 90 Pro Max: Yes
- Weight232 g vs 199 g+17%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Gold | Black, Light Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,756 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 83.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 804,373 | 509,611 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,558 | 2,029 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 37% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.23 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
