- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 90 Plus vs Poco M8x
Huawei Enjoy 90 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco M8x
What Enjoy 90 Plus does better (11) and where Poco M8x wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display6.5
5.2Performance5.0
5.5Camera4.6
8.4Battery9.0
5.5Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 90 PlusPoco M8x
| Enjoy 90 Plus | Poco M8x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 170.1 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 78.4 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 232 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 90 Plus better than Poco M8x?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- AnTuTu score682,743 vs 624,021+9%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,380 vs 2,230+7%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco M8x: No
- Weight212 g vs 232 g+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 254 ppi+4%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.1+18%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.8 mm+6%
Why is Poco M8x better than Enjoy 90 Plus?
- Stereo speakersNo · Enjoy 90 Plus: Yes
- Battery capacity6,620 mAh vs 7,900 mAh+19%
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 90 Plus: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Enjoy 90 Plus: Yes
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 86.2%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 170.1 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue | Leather Green, Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MP4 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,743 | 624,021 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,380 | 2,230 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,620 mAh | 7,900 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
