- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 70X Energy vs Moto G (2026)
Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy vs Motorola Moto G (2026)
What Enjoy 70X Energy does better (10) and where Moto G (2026) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display6.2
4.6Camera5.9
8.2Battery7.9
3.8Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 70X EnergyMoto G (2026)
| Enjoy 70X Energy | Moto G (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 167.2 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 202 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 70X Energy better than Moto G (2026)?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- OLED panelYes · Moto G (2026): No
- Battery capacity6,100 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+17%
- Wired charging40 W vs 30 W+33%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 262 ppi+67%
- Weight189 g vs 202 g+7%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 720 px+70%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.8% vs 84.7%+7%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
Why is Moto G (2026) better than Enjoy 70X Energy?
- NFCNo · Enjoy 70X Energy: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Enjoy 70X Energy: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 70X Energy: Yes
- eSIMNo · Enjoy 70X Energy: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Enjoy 70X Energy: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue | Pantone: Slipstream, Cattleya Orchid |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 948 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 84.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 417,027 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,100 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,100 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.8 h |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -21.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
