- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 60X vs Moto G84
Huawei Enjoy 60X vs Motorola Moto G84
What Enjoy 60X does better (4) and where Moto G84 wins (15) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 60XMoto G84
| Enjoy 60X | Moto G84 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.6 mm | 160 mm | +11.6 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 74.4 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 216 g | 167 g | +49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 60X better than Moto G84?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+40%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Screen size7″ vs 6.5″+7%
Why is Moto G84 better than Enjoy 60X?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Enjoy 60X: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Enjoy 60X: Yes
- 5GNo · Enjoy 60X: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging22 W vs 30 W+33%
- Weight216 g vs 167 g+29%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 60X: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Enjoy 60X: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 216 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 171.6 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Green, Orange | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 376 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 389,015 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,824 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.5" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | My UX |
