- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 60 vs Galaxy A15 5G
Huawei Enjoy 60 vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
What Enjoy 60 does better (3) and where Galaxy A15 5G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display6.8
3.9Camera6.3
7.4Battery5.9
2.4Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 60Galaxy A15 5G
| Enjoy 60 | Galaxy A15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.3 mm | 160.1 mm | +8.2 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 76.8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 60 better than Galaxy A15 5G?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
Why is Galaxy A15 5G better than Enjoy 60?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Enjoy 60: Yes
- 5GNo · Enjoy 60: Yes
- NFCNo · Enjoy 60: Yes
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 396 ppi+52%
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Enjoy 60: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 168.3 mm | 160.1 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Gold | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Magical Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 786 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 710 | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G51 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 306,274 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,747 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 335 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 12
6.66.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsInfinix Note 30
6.66.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A15 5G
7.46.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.64.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsRealme 11x
6.66.5


