- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 60 Pro vs Redmi Note 12 4G
Huawei Enjoy 60 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
What Enjoy 60 Pro does better (4) and where Redmi Note 12 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display8.0
4.6Camera6.3
6.4Battery6.0
3.5Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 60 ProRedmi Note 12 4G
| Enjoy 60 Pro | Redmi Note 12 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.6 mm | 165.7 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 184 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 60 Pro better than Redmi Note 12 4G?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen-to-body ratio90% vs 85.3%+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12 4G better than Enjoy 60 Pro?
- OLED panelNo · Enjoy 60 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Enjoy 60 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Enjoy 60 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
- Weight193 g vs 184 g+5%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 7.9 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.6 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Green, Silver, Black | Onyx Gray, Mint Green, Ice Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 744 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 319,219 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.9 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
6.76.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GvsInfinix Note 30
6.56.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
6.16.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
6.86.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro
6.56.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy M14vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
6.76.5


