- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Enjoy 100 Pro vs Poco M8
Huawei Enjoy 100 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M8
What Enjoy 100 Pro does better (5) and where Poco M8 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display8.5
6.8Camera6.3
8.2Battery7.5
6.4Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Enjoy 100 ProPoco M8
| Enjoy 100 Pro | Poco M8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 164 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 178 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Enjoy 100 Pro better than Poco M8?
- Battery capacity6,100 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+11%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco M8: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.1+18%
Why is Poco M8 better than Enjoy 100 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 3,200 nits2.5×
- Stereo speakersNo · Enjoy 100 Pro: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx6+50%
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Memory card slotNo · Enjoy 100 Pro: Yes
- Weight192 g vs 178 g+8%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.4 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass (2x tougher) | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Pink | Black, Green, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,473 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8020A | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 631,693 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,898 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 866 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.88" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,100 mAh | 5,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.9 h |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 7.0 | Android 15 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 50 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
