- dotrising.com
- Compare
- X30 Max vs Galaxy M52 5G
Honor X30 Max vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What X30 Max does better (3) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Display6.8
5.9Camera7.5
5.2Battery5.3
7.1Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X30 MaxGalaxy M52 5G
| X30 Max | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174.4 mm | 164.2 mm | +10.2 mm |
| Width | 84.9 mm | 76.4 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 228 g | 173 g | +55 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X30 Max better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M52 5G: No
- Screen size7.1″ vs 6.7″+6%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than X30 Max?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- OLED panelNo · X30 Max: Yes
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Weight228 g vs 173 g+32%
- Memory card slotNo · X30 Max: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X30 Max: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · X30 Max: Yes
- Pixel density356 ppi vs 393 ppi+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.4 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 228 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 174.4 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 84.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver/Violet | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.1″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,280 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 356 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 5.0 | One UI 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7


