- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Win2 RT vs Galaxy S26
Honor Win2 RT vs Samsung Galaxy S26
What Win2 RT does better (12) and where Galaxy S26 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display7.8
9.3Camera9.2
9.6Battery5.4
9.3Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Win2 RTGalaxy S26
| Win2 RT | Galaxy S26 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 149.6 mm | +13.4 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 71.7 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.2 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 238 g | 167 g | +71 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Win2 RT better than Galaxy S26?
- Battery capacity12,070 mAh vs 4,300 mAh2.8×
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Wired charging90 W vs 25 W3.6×
- Refresh rate185 Hz vs 120 Hz+54%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
- Pixel density497 ppi vs 411 ppi+21%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.3″+9%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio92% vs 90%+2%
Why is Galaxy S26 better than Win2 RT?
- Peak brightness0 nits vs 2,600 nits
- Telephoto cameraNo · Win2 RT: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Win2 RT: Yes
- Weight238 g vs 167 g+43%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- eSIMNo · Win2 RT: Yes
- CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.2 mm+18%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 238 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 149.6 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 71.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue/Red | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,104 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 497 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 0 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,383 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.6 GHz | 4.74 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,441,481 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 10,824 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4. |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 12,070 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 15.3 h |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.21 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 11 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 51 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S25
9.18.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S24
9.18.7
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsSamsung Galaxy S26
9.19.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone (4a) Pro
9.19.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone Pro
9.19.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
9.19.3


