- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V40 Lite vs Galaxy M62
Honor V40 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy M62
What V40 Lite does better (6) and where Galaxy M62 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.2
7.9Camera7.5
4.2Battery8.0
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
V40 LiteGalaxy M62
| V40 Lite | Galaxy M62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.9 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 76.3 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 218 g | −49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V40 Lite better than Galaxy M62?
- Wired charging66 W vs 25 W2.6×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- 5GYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Weight169 g vs 218 g+29%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 9.5 mm+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 86.7%+3%
Why is Galaxy M62 better than V40 Lite?
- Battery capacity3,800 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+84%
- Memory card slotNo · V40 Lite: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · V40 Lite: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.73 GHz+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 169 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Green | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U | Exynos 9825 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.73 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,800 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco F3vsSamsung Galaxy M62
7.47.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsRealme GT Master
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Poco X3 GT
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
7.27.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsOPPO Reno6 5G
7.27.1