- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V Purse vs P50 Pocket
Honor V Purse vs Huawei P50 Pocket
What V Purse does better (8) and where P50 Pocket wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.3Display8.2
3.2Camera3.4
4.9Battery3.3
4.7Features3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
V PurseP50 Pocket
| V Purse | P50 Pocket | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156.5 mm | 170 mm | −13.5 mm |
| Width | 135.6 mm | 75.5 mm | +60.1 mm |
| Thickness | 4.3 mm | 7.2 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 190 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V Purse better than P50 Pocket?
- 5GYes · P50 Pocket: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+12%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 40 MP+25%
- Screen size7.7″ vs 6.9″+12%
- Resolution (width)2,016 px vs 1,188 px+70%
- Thickness4.3 mm vs 7.2 mm+67%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 85.1%+5%
Why is P50 Pocket better than V Purse?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging35 W vs 40 W+14%
- Memory card slotNo · V Purse: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · V Purse: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+18%
- Weight214 g vs 190 g+13%
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 442 ppi+10%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 11 MP+34%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 4.3 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 156.5 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 135.6 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, Gold, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,016 px | 1,188 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,348 px | 2,790 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 442 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 803 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 85.1% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 768,513 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,077 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 11 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 40 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China) |
| Platform | Android | HarmonyOS |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | EMUI 12 (Europe) |
