- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Play11 vs Enjoy 90 Pro Max
Honor Play11 vs Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro Max
What Play11 does better (5) and where Enjoy 90 Pro Max wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display9.5
5.1Performance5.5
4.1Camera5.5
9.0Battery8.8
8.4Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play11Enjoy 90 Pro Max
| Play11 | Enjoy 90 Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.3 mm | 163.3 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 78 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 216 g | 232 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play11 better than Enjoy 90 Pro Max?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Wired charging45 W vs 40 W+12%
- Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
- Weight216 g vs 232 g+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Enjoy 90 Pro Max better than Play11?
- Peak brightness1,020 nits vs 4,000 nits3.9×
- AnTuTu score593,167 vs 804,373+36%
- OLED panelNo · Play11: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Pixel density254 ppi vs 444 ppi+75%
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 8,500 mAh+2%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,211 vs 2,558+16%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Play11: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,272 px+77%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 216 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 168.3 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Gold, Purple | Black, White, Blue, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,272 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,592 px | 2,756 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 444 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,020 nits | 4,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 90.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 | Kirin 8000 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Kirin |
| Process | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MP4 |
| AnTuTu score | 593,167 | 804,373 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,211 | 2,558 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 8,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 40 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | HarmonyOS 6.0 |
| Platform | Android | HarmonyOS |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | — |
