- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Play 5T Pro vs Galaxy A52
Honor Play 5T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52
What Play 5T Pro does better (2) and where Galaxy A52 wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display6.9
6.1Camera8.7
2.9Battery3.3
3.5Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play 5T ProGalaxy A52
| Play 5T Pro | Galaxy A52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.7 mm | 159.9 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.1 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 179 g | 189 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play 5T Pro better than Galaxy A52?
- Weight179 g vs 189 g+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 84.1%+6%
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Play 5T Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Memory card slotNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Play 5T Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 160.7 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Magic Black, Titanium Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 794 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 261,282 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,865 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.35 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 4.0 | One UI 6.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A52
7.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
6.96.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.94.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
6.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A33 5G
6.97.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A23
6.95.9


