- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Play 4T vs Galaxy A01 Core
Honor Play 4T vs Samsung Galaxy A01 Core
What Play 4T does better (13) and where Galaxy A01 Core wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display2.8
3.9Camera2.3
2.4Features2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play 4TGalaxy A01 Core
| Play 4T | Galaxy A01 Core | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.8 mm | 141.7 mm | +18.1 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 67.5 mm | +8.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 150 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play 4T better than Galaxy A01 Core?
- RAM6 GB vs 2 GB3×
- Main camera48 MP vs 8 MP6×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh+33%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz+47%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 16 GB8×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 5.3″+21%
- Process14 nm vs 28 nm2×
- CPU cores8 vs 42×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.4% vs 74.5%+11%
Why is Galaxy A01 Core better than Play 4T?
- Weight176 g vs 150 g+17%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 311 ppi+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 176 g | 150 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 159.8 mm | 141.7 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Green | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 5.3″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,560 px | 1,480 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 311 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 74.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 710A | Mediatek MT6739 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 8 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.64 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 3.1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A03 CorevsSamsung Galaxy A01 Core
3.74.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsHuawei Y7p
4.04.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsRealme C3 (3 cameras)
4.04.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsHuawei Y8s
4.04.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsHuawei P40 lite E
4.04.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsNokia C5 Endi
4.04.0