- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Play 40 vs Galaxy A15 5G
Honor Play 40 vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
What Play 40 does better (3) and where Galaxy A15 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display6.8
2.7Camera6.3
5.4Battery5.9
5.0Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play 40Galaxy A15 5G
| Play 40 | Galaxy A15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 160.1 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.8 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 188 g | 200 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play 40 better than Galaxy A15 5G?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight188 g vs 200 g+6%
Why is Galaxy A15 5G better than Play 40?
- Main camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Wired charging10 W vs 25 W2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Play 40: Yes
- NFCNo · Play 40: Yes
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 396 ppi+47%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Memory card slotNo · Play 40: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Play 40: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 160.1 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Blue, Mint, Black, Purple | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Magical Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 786 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 306,274 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,747 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 335 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 7.1 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 12
6.66.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsInfinix Note 30
6.66.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A15 5G
7.46.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.64.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsRealme 11x
6.66.5


