- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 90 vs nova 11 Ultra
Honor 90 vs Huawei nova 11 Ultra
What 90 does better (9) and where nova 11 Ultra wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display8.8
7.8Camera6.7
4.2Battery6.4
8.7Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
90nova 11 Ultra
| 90 | nova 11 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.3 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.4 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 188 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 better than nova 11 Ultra?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- 5GYes · nova 11 Ultra: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- eSIMYes · nova 11 Ultra: No
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Weight183 g vs 188 g+3%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is nova 11 Ultra better than 90?
- Wired charging66 W vs 100 W+52%
- Stereo speakersNo · 90: Yes
- Charged in 30 min69% vs 240%3.5×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.4+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | — | Kunlun Glass |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Black, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,652 px |
| Pixel density | 435 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,176 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 91.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 575,122 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,011 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 857 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.4 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 10.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 69% | 240% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | HarmonyOS 3.0 |
| Platform | Android | HarmonyOS |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | — |
