- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 90 Smart vs Hot 50 Pro 4G
Honor 90 Smart vs Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
What 90 Smart does better (4) and where Hot 50 Pro 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display8.8
3.7Performance4.4
5.6Camera4.6
7.7Battery6.0
8.1Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 SmartHot 50 Pro 4G
| 90 Smart | Hot 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.7 mm | 167 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Smart better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- 5GYes · Hot 50 Pro 4G: No
- Battery capacity5,330 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+7%
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than 90 Smart?
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,800 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · 90 Smart: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- AnTuTu score532,792 vs 562,039+5%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,910 vs 1,992+4%
- Memory card slotNo · 90 Smart: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+11%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 166.7 mm | 167 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 86.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 532,792 | 562,039 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,910 | 1,992 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,330 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic OS 7.2 | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Honor 90 SmartvsRealme 14x (India)
7.07.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.66.7
vs
Infinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
7.66.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.86.7