How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 600 vs iQOO Neo12

Honor 600 vs Vivo iQOO Neo12

What 600 does better (7) and where iQOO Neo12 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Honor 600
Honor · 2026600
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $640
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo12
Vivo · 2026iQOO Neo12
9.5Score
12 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
9.1Display9.7
9.0Camera8.8
9.3Battery9.6
9.8Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

600iQOO Neo12
74.7 × 1567.875.9 × 163.48.5
600iQOO Neo12Difference
Height156 mm163.4 mm−7.4 mm
Width74.7 mm75.9 mm−1.2 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8.5 mm−0.7 mm
Weight185 g225 g−40 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 600 better than iQOO Neo12?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Peak brightness8,000 nits vs 2,200 nits3.6×
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  4. Weight185 g vs 225 g+22%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo12: No
  6. eSIMYes · iQOO Neo12: No
  7. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+9%

Why is iQOO Neo12 better than 600?

  1. Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 9,000 mAh+29%
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 185 Hz+54%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  5. Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
  6. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+64%
  7. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  8. Max video4K vs 8K
  9. Pixel density458 ppi vs 514 ppi+12%
  10. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
  11. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  12. Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 600Honor 600≈ $6409.4
Vivo iQOO Neo12Vivo iQOO Neo12≈ $6209.5
Design
Weight185 g225 g
Thickness7.8 mm8.5 mm
Height156 mm163.4 mm
Width74.7 mm75.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursGolden White, Black, OrangeBlack, Blue, Gray
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,264 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,728 px3,200 px
Pixel density458 ppi514 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness8,000 nits2,200 nits
Measured brightness1,749 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio91.2%90.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 722Adreno 840
AnTuTu score1,087,148—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,090—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,797—
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.56"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity7,000 mAh9,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)17 h—
Wired charging80 W100 W
Charged in 30 min71%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (ultrasound), compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10OriginOS 7
Major OS updates promised6—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle67 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare