- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 50 SE vs Galaxy M52 5G
Honor 50 SE vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What 50 SE does better (6) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.8
7.4Camera7.5
4.3Battery5.3
5.8Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 SEGalaxy M52 5G
| 50 SE | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.7 mm | 164.2 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 173 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 SE better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Wired charging66 W vs 25 W2.6×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min112% vs 30%3.7×
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 86.4%+3%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than 50 SE?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- OLED panelNo · 50 SE: Yes
- NFCNo · 50 SE: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · 50 SE: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · 50 SE: Yes
- Weight191 g vs 173 g+10%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.4 mm+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.7 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 4.2 | One UI 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7


