How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 400 Pro vs Pura 80

Honor 400 Pro vs Huawei Pura 80

What 400 Pro does better (13) and where Pura 80 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Honor 400 Pro
Honor · 2025400 Pro
9.5Score
13 advantages≈ $630
Higher score
vs
Huawei Pura 80
Huawei · 2025Pura 80
9.2Score
3 advantages≈ $630
9.3Display8.4
8.4Performance7.4
9.5Camera9.5
8.5Battery8.9
9.8Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

400 ProPura 80
76.1 × 160.88.174.4 × 157.78.2
400 ProPura 80Difference
Height160.8 mm157.7 mm+3.1 mm
Width76.1 mm74.4 mm+1.7 mm
Thickness8.1 mm8.2 mm−0.1 mm
Weight205 g211 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Pro better than Pura 80?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. AnTuTu score1,902,675 vs 1,200,000+59%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,552 vs 4,183+57%
  4. Wired charging100 W vs 66 W+52%
  5. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 2,800 nits+79%
  6. Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 5,170 mAh+3%
  7. Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
  8. eSIMYes · Pura 80: No
  9. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+20%
  10. Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
  11. Weight205 g vs 211 g+3%
  12. Charged in 30 min102% vs 70%+46%

Why is Pura 80 better than 400 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  2. Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
  3. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.4+36%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 400 ProHonor 400 Pro≈ $6309.5
Huawei Pura 80Huawei Pura 80≈ $6309.2
Design
Weight205 g211 g
Thickness8.1 mm8.2 mm
Height160.8 mm157.7 mm
Width76.1 mm74.4 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Kunlun Glass 2
ColoursMidnight Black, Lunar Grey, Tidal BlueFrosted Gold, Frosted White, Frosted Black, Green
Display
Screen size6.7″6.6″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,256 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,760 px
Pixel density460 ppi459 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits2,800 nits
Measured brightness1,481 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.5%90.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Kirin 9010s
Chip makerQualcommKirin
Process4 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Maleoon 910
AnTuTu score1,902,6751,200,000
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,5524,183
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,620—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.4
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.3"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP13 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,300 mAh5,170 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)13.9 h—
Wired charging100 W66 W
Charged in 30 min102%70%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.4 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic)Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15EMUI 15 (International)
PlatformAndroidHarmonyOS
InterfaceMagicOS 10EMUI 15
Major OS updates promised6—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle56 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare