How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 400 Pro vs nova 16 Ultra

Honor 400 Pro vs Huawei nova 16 Ultra

What 400 Pro does better (7) and where nova 16 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Honor 400 Pro
Honor · 2025400 Pro
9.5Score
7 advantages≈ $630
Higher score
vs
Huawei nova 16 Ultra
Huawei · 2026nova 16 Ultra
9.5Score
9 advantages≈ $650
9.3Display9.4
8.4Performance7.2
9.5Camera9.6
8.5Battery9.7
9.8Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

400 Pronova 16 Ultra
76.1 × 160.88.178 × 1637.1
400 Pronova 16 UltraDifference
Height160.8 mm163 mm−2.2 mm
Width76.1 mm78 mm−1.9 mm
Thickness8.1 mm7.1 mm+1 mm
Weight205 g220 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Pro better than nova 16 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score1,902,675 vs 1,229,229+55%
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,552 vs 3,598+82%
  3. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  4. eSIMYes · nova 16 Ultra: No
  5. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+20%
  6. Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
  7. Weight205 g vs 220 g+7%

Why is nova 16 Ultra better than 400 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+32%
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  3. Optical zoom3× vs 3.7×+23%
  4. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 6,000 nits+20%
  5. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
  6. Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.1 mm+14%
  7. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
  9. Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,320 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 400 ProHonor 400 Pro≈ $6309.5
Design
Weight205 g220 g
Thickness8.1 mm7.1 mm
Height160.8 mm163 mm
Width76.1 mm78 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Kunlun Glass
ColoursMidnight Black, Lunar Grey, Tidal BlueBlack, White, Blue
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,320 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,856 px
Pixel density460 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits6,000 nits
Measured brightness1,481 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.5%90.4%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Kirin 9010S
Chip makerQualcommKirin
Process4 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Maleoon 920
AnTuTu score1,902,6751,229,229
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,5523,598
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,620—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.28"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3.7×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,300 mAh7,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)13.9 h—
Wired charging100 W100 W
Charged in 30 min102%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.4 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic)Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15HarmonyOS 6.1
PlatformAndroidHarmonyOS
InterfaceMagicOS 10—
Major OS updates promised6—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle56 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare