How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 400 Pro vs Mate 80

Honor 400 Pro vs Huawei Mate 80

What 400 Pro does better (9) and where Mate 80 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Honor 400 Pro
Honor · 2025400 Pro
9.5Score
9 advantages≈ $630
Higher score
vs
Huawei Mate 80
Huawei · 2025Mate 80
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $620
9.3Display8.5
8.4Performance7.9
9.5Camera9.6
8.5Battery9.1
9.8Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

400 ProMate 80
76.1 × 160.88.176 × 161.98
400 ProMate 80Difference
Height160.8 mm161.9 mm−1.1 mm
Width76.1 mm76 mm+0.1 mm
Thickness8.1 mm8 mm+0.1 mm
Weight205 g217 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Pro better than Mate 80?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Wired charging100 W vs 66 W+52%
  3. AnTuTu score1,902,675 vs 1,589,460+20%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,552 vs 4,988+31%
  5. Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
  6. eSIMYes · Mate 80: No
  7. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+20%
  8. Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
  9. Weight205 g vs 217 g+6%

Why is Mate 80 better than 400 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  2. Optical zoom3× vs 5.5×+83%
  3. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  4. Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 5,750 mAh+8%
  5. USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.4+36%
  7. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 400 ProHonor 400 Pro≈ $6309.5
Huawei Mate 80Huawei Mate 80≈ $6209.4
Design
Weight205 g217 g
Thickness8.1 mm8 mm
Height160.8 mm161.9 mm
Width76.1 mm76 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Huawei Kunlun Glass 2
ColoursMidnight Black, Lunar Grey, Tidal BlueBlack, White, Green, Gold
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,832 px
Pixel density460 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,481 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.5%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Kirin 9020
Chip makerQualcommKirin
Process4 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Maleoon 920
AnTuTu score1,902,6751,589,460
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,5524,988
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,620—
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.4
Main sensor size1/1.4"—
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×5.5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP13 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,300 mAh5,750 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)13.9 h—
Wired charging100 W66 W
Charged in 30 min102%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1
USB version23.1
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.4 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayYes
3D face unlock—Yes
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic)Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15HarmonyOS 6.0
PlatformAndroidHarmonyOS
InterfaceMagicOS 10—
Major OS updates promised6—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle56 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare