dotrising.com
Compare
400 Pro (China) vs Edge 60 Pro

Honor 400 Pro (China) vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro

What 400 Pro (China) does better (9) and where Edge 60 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2025400 Pro (China)

9.5Score

9 advantages≈ $450

Higher score

Motorola · 2025Edge 60 Pro

9.3Score

5 advantages≈ $460

9.0Display9.2

9.6Camera9.1

9.7Battery8.9

9.3Features8.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

400 Pro (China)Edge 60 Pro

	400 Pro (China)	Edge 60 Pro	Difference
Height	156.3 mm	160.7 mm	−4.4 mm
Width	74.7 mm	73.1 mm	+1.6 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	8.2 mm	−0.4 mm
Weight	204 g	186 g	+18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Pro (China) better than Edge 60 Pro?

Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
Wireless charging power50 W vs 15 W3.3×
Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+11%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 444 ppi+4%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%
Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,220 px+4%

Why is Edge 60 Pro better than 400 Pro (China)?

eSIMNo · 400 Pro (China): Yes
Weight204 g vs 186 g+10%
Screen size6.6″ vs 6.7″+2%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Screen-to-body ratio90.3% vs 92.2%+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 400 Pro (China)≈ $4509.5	Motorola Edge 60 Pro≈ $4609.3
Design
Weight	204 g	186 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	8.2 mm
Height	156.3 mm	160.7 mm
Width	74.7 mm	73.1 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Aluminosilicate glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Silver, Blue, Pink	Pantone: Shadow, Dazzling Blue, Sparkling Grape
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	P-OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,264 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,736 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	444 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	5,000 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,595 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3%	92.2%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.35 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Mali G615-MC6
AnTuTu score	—	1,356,227
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,476
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,221
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	200 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.4"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	3×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,200 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	16.2 h
Wired charging	90 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	80%	81%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.9 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	Hello UI
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	68 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	A