- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 300 Pro vs nova 12 Pro
Honor 300 Pro vs Huawei nova 12 Pro
What 300 Pro does better (13) and where nova 12 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.4
8.9Performance7.3
9.4Camera6.4
9.5Battery6.7
8.3Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
300 Pronova 12 Pro
| 300 Pro | nova 12 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.1 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 Pro better than nova 12 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,508,188 vs 1,117,2362.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,655 vs 4,118+62%
- Optical stabilisationYes · nova 12 Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · nova 12 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · nova 12 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+15%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.62 GHz+15%
- Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is nova 12 Pro better than 300 Pro?
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 449 ppi+3%
- Charged in 30 min118% vs 180%+53%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.4+43%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | Black, Blue, White, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,776 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 89% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Kirin 9000S |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Kirin |
| Process | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.62 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Maleoon 910 MP4 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,508,188 | 1,117,236 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,655 | 4,118 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.4 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 118% | 180% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | HarmonyOS 4.0 |
| Platform | Android | HarmonyOS |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | HarmonyOS 4.0 |
