- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 200 vs 21 Pro
Honor 200 vs Meizu 21 Pro
What 200 does better (9) and where 21 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
20021 Pro
| 200 | 21 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 165 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 208 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 better than 21 Pro?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,250 nits3.2×
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,050 mAh+3%
- 4K selfie videoYes · 21 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · 21 Pro: No
- Weight187 g vs 208 g+11%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio90% vs 87.4%+3%
Why is 21 Pro better than 200?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · 200: Yes
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+25%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Optical zoom2.5× vs 3×+20%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 512 ppi+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,368 px+14%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 165 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Meizu Titan Glass 2.0 |
| Colours | Coral Pink, Moonlight White, Emerald Green, Black | Black, White, Blue, Green, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,368 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 3,192 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 512 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,250 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 87.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,002,480 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,214 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 114% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Flyme OS / Flyme AIOS 2 |
| Platform | Android | Other |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | Flyme |
