- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 200 Pro vs T909
Honor 200 Pro vs Tel.Me. T909
What 200 Pro does better (7) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 ProT909
| 200 Pro | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 109 mm | +54.3 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 44 mm | +31.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 22 mm | −13.8 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 95 g | +104 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Pro better than T909?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 600 mAh8.7×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 22 mm2.7×
- eSIMYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than 200 Pro?
- Weight199 g vs 95 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Moonlight White, Black, Ocean Cyan, Pink | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | — |
| Panel | OLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | — |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,110 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | — |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | — |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 1,281,655 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,759 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,955 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
