How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Terra M Dark vs 215 4G (2026)

HMD Terra M Dark vs Nokia 215 4G (2026)

What Terra M Dark does better (3) and where 215 4G (2026) wins (3) — every spec side by side.

HMD Terra M Dark
HMD · 2026Terra M Dark
3 advantages≈ $210
vs
Nokia 215 4G (2026)
Nokia · 2026215 4G (2026)
3 advantages
Dimensions

Size comparison

Terra M Dark215 4G (2026)
66 × 1471555 × 128.812.8
Terra M Dark215 4G (2026)Difference
Height147 mm128.8 mm+18.2 mm
Width66 mm55 mm+11 mm
Thickness15 mm12.8 mm+2.2 mm
Weight210 g104 g+106 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Terra M Dark better than 215 4G (2026)?

  1. RAM2 GB vs 0.062 GB32×
  2. Battery capacity2,510 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+73%
  3. Resolution (width)480 px vs 240 px2×

Why is 215 4G (2026) better than Terra M Dark?

  1. Weight210 g vs 104 g2×
  2. Dual SIMNo · Terra M Dark: Yes
  3. Thickness15 mm vs 12.8 mm+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight210 g104 g
Thickness15 mm12.8 mm
Height147 mm128.8 mm
Width66 mm55 mm
Glass protectionGorilla Glass 3—
ColoursBlackBlack, Red
Display
Screen size2.8″2.8″
PanelLCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)480 px240 px
Resolution (height)640 px320 px
Pixel density—143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—34.3%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Dragonwing QCM2290—
Chip makerQualcomm—
CPU cores4—
CPU frequency2 GHz—
Memory
RAM2 GB0.062 GB
Memory card slot—Yes
Camera
Main camera8 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Selfie camera—0.3 MP
Battery
Battery capacity2,510 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIM—No
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth—5
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare