- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 3210 vs 215 4G (2026)
HMD 3210 vs Nokia 215 4G (2026)
What 3210 does better (1) and where 215 4G (2026) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
2.1Display2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
3210215 4G (2026)
| 3210 | 215 4G (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 122 mm | 128.8 mm | −6.8 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 55 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 13.1 mm | 12.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3210 better than 215 4G (2026)?
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
Why is 215 4G (2026) better than 3210?
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio28.1% vs 34.3%+22%
- Thickness13.1 mm vs 12.8 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 104 g |
| Thickness | 13.1 mm | 12.8 mm |
| Height | 122 mm | 128.8 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 55 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Blue, Red | Black, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28.1% | 34.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Process | 22 nm | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Selfie camera | — | 0.3 MP |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
