- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 105 4G vs 130 (2023)
HMD 105 4G vs Nokia 130 (2023)
What 105 4G does better (4) and where 130 (2023) wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Display2.1
2.1Battery2.1
3.1Features2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G130 (2023)
| 105 4G | 130 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 130.9 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 50.6 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 10.4 mm | 14 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 98 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G better than 130 (2023)?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Weight93 g vs 98 g+6%
- Thickness10.4 mm vs 14 mm+34%
- Screen-to-body ratio28% vs 26.9%+4%
Why is 130 (2023) better than 105 4G?
130 (2023) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 98 g |
| Thickness | 10.4 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 130.9 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 50.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black, Pink, Cyan | Dark Blue, Purple, Light Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | 26.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T127 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.12 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 1.1 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
| Software | ||
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
