- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Iron Va vs Galaxy A17 4G
HAMMER Iron Va vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
What Iron Va does better (3) and where Galaxy A17 4G wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Display7.0
2.7Camera7.8
8.9Battery5.3
8.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Iron VaGalaxy A17 4G
| Iron Va | Galaxy A17 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 164.4 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 77.9 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 7.5 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Weight | 412 g | 190 g | +222 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Iron Va better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+30%
- eSIMYes · Galaxy A17 4G: No
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Iron Va?
- Main camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Weight412 g vs 190 g2.2×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Iron Va: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Iron Va: Yes
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 385 ppi+43%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Iron Va: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black | Black, Gray, Light blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.1% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Cortex A53 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 526,972 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,052 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 52 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A55
7.08.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G
7.07.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A17
7.07.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsSamsung Galaxy A35
7.07.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsInfinix Hot 60 Pro+
7.07.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17 4GvsXiaomi Redmi 15C
7.06.9


