- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Pixel Fold vs Galaxy Z Fold 3
Google Pixel Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
What Pixel Fold does better (12) and where Galaxy Z Fold 3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display5.5
7.3Camera4.7
6.5Battery4.0
7.6Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel FoldGalaxy Z Fold 3
| Pixel Fold | Galaxy Z Fold 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 139.7 mm | 158.2 mm | −18.5 mm |
| Width | 158.7 mm | 128.1 mm | +30.6 mm |
| Thickness | 5.8 mm | 6.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 283 g | 271 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel Fold better than Galaxy Z Fold 3?
- Main camera48 MP vs 12 MP4×
- Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy Z Fold 3: No
- Battery capacity4,821 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+10%
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 4 MP2×
- Dual SIMYes · Galaxy Z Fold 3: No
- Wireless charging power20 W vs 11 W+82%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Thickness5.8 mm vs 6.4 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Resolution (width)1,840 px vs 1,768 px+4%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold 3 better than Pixel Fold?
- Screen-to-body ratio82.7% vs 171.3%2.1×
- Weight283 g vs 271 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 283 g | 271 g |
| Thickness | 5.8 mm | 6.4 mm |
| Height | 139.7 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 158.7 mm | 128.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Porcelain, Obsidian | Phantom Silver, Phantom Black, Phantom Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.6″ | 7.6″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Dynamic Amoled 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,840 px | 1,768 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,208 px | 2,208 px |
| Pixel density | 378 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,450 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,232 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 171.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | |
| Process | 5 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.85 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MP7 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 859,865 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,833 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 4 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,821 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | 11 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 3.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
