How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9a vs Reno13 FS 5G

Google Pixel 9a vs OPPO Reno13 FS 5G

What Pixel 9a does better (9) and where Reno13 FS 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9a
Google · 2025Pixel 9a
8.8Score
9 advantages≈ $340
vs
OPPO Reno13 FS 5G
OPPO · 2025Reno13 FS 5G
9.1Score
12 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
8.1Display9.3
8.2Camera8.8
5.4Battery8.1
9.8Features9.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9aReno13 FS 5G
73.3 × 154.78.975 × 162.27.8
Pixel 9aReno13 FS 5GDifference
Height154.7 mm162.2 mm−7.5 mm
Width73.3 mm75 mm−1.7 mm
Thickness8.9 mm7.8 mm+1.1 mm
Weight186 g192 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9a better than Reno13 FS 5G?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · Reno13 FS 5G: No
  2. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+41%
  3. eSIMYes · Reno13 FS 5G: No
  4. Dual SIMYes · Reno13 FS 5G: No
  5. Pixel density422 ppi vs 394 ppi+7%
  6. Weight186 g vs 192 g+3%
  7. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
  9. Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%

Why is Reno13 FS 5G better than Pixel 9a?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 180 Hz+50%
  2. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  3. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+14%
  5. Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
  6. Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
  7. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  8. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
  9. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
  10. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  11. Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+14%
  12. Screen-to-body ratio83.5% vs 92.2%+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Google Pixel 9aGoogle Pixel 9a≈ $3408.8
Design
Weight186 g192 g
Thickness8.9 mm7.8 mm
Height154.7 mm162.2 mm
Width73.3 mm75 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP68IP69
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx9
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3—
ColoursObsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony—
Display
Screen size6.3″6.7″
PanelP-OLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,424 px2,400 px
Pixel density422 ppi394 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz180 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits—
Measured brightness1,930 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio83.5%92.2%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MP7Adreno 710
AnTuTu score1,254,417—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,527—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,630—
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNo—
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"—
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K—
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,100 mAh5,800 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)12.7 h—
Wired charging23 W—
Charged in 30 min47%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2—
USB version3.2—
Video outputYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
Loudspeaker loudness-27.2 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display—
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerproximity, accelerometer, gyro
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15—
PlatformAndroid—
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classBB
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle52 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare