- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Pixel 8 vs Enjoy 60X
Google Pixel 8 vs Huawei Enjoy 60X
What Pixel 8 does better (20) and where Enjoy 60X wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 8Enjoy 60X
| Pixel 8 | Enjoy 60X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150.5 mm | 171.6 mm | −21.1 mm |
| Width | 70.8 mm | 79.9 mm | −9.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 187 g | 216 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 8 better than Enjoy 60X?
- OLED panelYes · Enjoy 60X: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Enjoy 60X: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Enjoy 60X: No
- 5GYes · Enjoy 60X: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Wired charging27 W vs 22 W+20%
- CPU frequency2.91 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+21%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Enjoy 60X: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Enjoy 60X: No
- eSIMYes · Enjoy 60X: No
Why is Enjoy 60X better than Pixel 8?
- Battery capacity4,575 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+53%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Screen size6.2″ vs 7″+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 216 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 150.5 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 70.8 mm | 79.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Obsidian, Hazel, Rose, Mint | Black, Silver, Green, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.2″ | 7″ |
| Panel | OLED | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 428 ppi | 376 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,446 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 85.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G3 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 9 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.91 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MP7 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 926,801 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,526 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,575 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 27 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 18 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | HarmonyOS 3.0 |
| Platform | Android | HarmonyOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
