- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Pixel 4 vs Galaxy A50
Google Pixel 4 vs Samsung Galaxy A50
What Pixel 4 does better (11) and where Galaxy A50 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display7.5
6.7Camera5.2
2.8Battery2.7
7.6Features3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 4Galaxy A50
| Pixel 4 | Galaxy A50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 147.1 mm | 158.5 mm | −11.4 mm |
| Width | 68.8 mm | 74.7 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 162 g | 166 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 4 better than Galaxy A50?
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy A50: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A50: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy A50: No
- NFCYes · Galaxy A50: No
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+23%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Galaxy A50: No
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 408 ppi+9%
- Weight162 g vs 166 g+2%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Why is Galaxy A50 better than Pixel 4?
- Main camera12 MP vs 25 MP2×
- Battery capacity2,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+43%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 25 MP3.1×
- Memory card slotNo · Pixel 4: Yes
- Screen size5.7″ vs 6.4″+12%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio79.8% vs 84.9%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 162 g | 166 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 147.1 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 68.8 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Clearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,280 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 408 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 423 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 79.8% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Samsung |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali G72 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | 395,351 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,542 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 868 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 25 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 25 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,800 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 11 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | — |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 1.19 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI |
