- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M15 vs Galaxy A32
Gionee M15 vs Samsung Galaxy A32
What M15 does better (4) and where Galaxy A32 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display7.0
6.0Camera7.1
6.2Battery4.0
2.4Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
M15Galaxy A32
| M15 | Galaxy A32 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 158.9 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 73.6 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M15 better than Galaxy A32?
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+4%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2 GHz+2%
Why is Galaxy A32 better than M15?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · M15: Yes
- NFCNo · M15: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 411 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.4 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 184 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Gray | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 814 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 286,666 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,277 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.45 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A32
4.85.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A73 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
8.05.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.15.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A23vsSamsung Galaxy A32
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A03vsSamsung Galaxy A32
3.95.8