- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C250 Comfort Power 4G vs 300 Charge
Funker C250 Comfort Power 4G vs Nokia 300 Charge
What C250 Comfort Power 4G does better (1) and where 300 Charge wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
C250 Comfort Power 4G300 Charge
| C250 Comfort Power 4G | 300 Charge | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 136.6 mm | −31.6 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 55 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 15 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 138 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C250 Comfort Power 4G better than 300 Charge?
- Weight128 g vs 138 g+8%
Why is 300 Charge better than C250 Comfort Power 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 3,700 mAh3.7×
- Dual SIMNo · C250 Comfort Power 4G: Yes
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 15 mm+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 138 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 136.6 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 55 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Green, Sandstone, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 23.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc SC6531E |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 3,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
