- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C250 Comfort Power 4G vs 215 4G (2026)
Funker C250 Comfort Power 4G vs Nokia 215 4G (2026)
What C250 Comfort Power 4G does better (0) and where 215 4G (2026) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C250 Comfort Power 4G215 4G (2026)
| C250 Comfort Power 4G | 215 4G (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 128.8 mm | −23.8 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 55 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 12.8 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 104 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C250 Comfort Power 4G better than 215 4G (2026)?
C250 Comfort Power 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 215 4G (2026) better than C250 Comfort Power 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight128 g vs 104 g+23%
- Dual SIMNo · C250 Comfort Power 4G: Yes
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 12.8 mm+66%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 104 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 12.8 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 128.8 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 55 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 34.3% |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Selfie camera | — | 0.3 MP |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
