- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C250 Comfort Power 4G vs 210 4G
Funker C250 Comfort Power 4G vs Nokia 210 4G
What C250 Comfort Power 4G does better (0) and where 210 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Camera2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
C250 Comfort Power 4G210 4G
| C250 Comfort Power 4G | 210 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 126.1 mm | −21.1 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 13 mm | +8.3 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 93 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C250 Comfort Power 4G better than 210 4G?
C250 Comfort Power 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 210 4G better than C250 Comfort Power 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight128 g vs 93 g+38%
- Dual SIMNo · C250 Comfort Power 4G: Yes
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 13 mm+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 13 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 126.1 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50.5 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Dark Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 28% |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | — | 0.3 MP |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
