- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C250 Comfort Power 4G vs 123 Shield
Funker C250 Comfort Power 4G vs Nokia 123 Shield
What C250 Comfort Power 4G does better (0) and where 123 Shield wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
C250 Comfort Power 4G123 Shield
| C250 Comfort Power 4G | 123 Shield | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 132.7 mm | −27.7 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 57 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 15 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 108 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C250 Comfort Power 4G better than 123 Shield?
C250 Comfort Power 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 123 Shield better than C250 Comfort Power 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,750 mAh+75%
- Dual SIMNo · C250 Comfort Power 4G: Yes
- Weight128 g vs 108 g+19%
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 15 mm+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 108 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 132.7 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 57 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Colours | Grey | Green, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 23.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc SC6531E |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,750 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
