- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C250 Comfort Power 4G vs 110 4G 2nd Edition
Funker C250 Comfort Power 4G vs Nokia 110 4G 2nd Edition
What C250 Comfort Power 4G does better (2) and where 110 4G 2nd Edition wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Camera3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
C250 Comfort Power 4G110 4G 2nd Edition
| C250 Comfort Power 4G | 110 4G 2nd Edition | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 121.5 mm | −16.5 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 14.4 mm | +6.9 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 94 g | +34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C250 Comfort Power 4G better than 110 4G 2nd Edition?
- Main camera0.3 MP vs 0.1 MP3×
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
Why is 110 4G 2nd Edition better than C250 Comfort Power 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight128 g vs 94 g+35%
- Dual SIMNo · C250 Comfort Power 4G: Yes
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 14.4 mm+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 94 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Grey | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 0.1 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Nokia Series 30+ |
| Platform | — | Other |
