How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. C200 Comfort 4G vs Armor Mini 2

Funker C200 Comfort 4G vs UleFone Armor Mini 2

What C200 Comfort 4G does better (1) and where Armor Mini 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Funker C200 Comfort 4G
Funker · 2022C200 Comfort 4G
1 advantage≈ $55
vs
UleFone Armor Mini 2
UleFone · 2021Armor Mini 2
3.9Score
3 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
3.0Camera3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

C200 Comfort 4GArmor Mini 2
52 × 10521.362.5 × 13816.6
C200 Comfort 4GArmor Mini 2Difference
Height105 mm138 mm−33 mm
Width52 mm62.5 mm−10.5 mm
Thickness21.3 mm16.6 mm+4.7 mm
Weight128 g158 g−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than Armor Mini 2?

  1. Weight128 g vs 158 g+23%

Why is Armor Mini 2 better than C200 Comfort 4G?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 2,100 mAh2.1×
  2. Dual SIMNo · C200 Comfort 4G: Yes
  3. Thickness21.3 mm vs 16.6 mm+28%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight128 g158 g
Thickness21.3 mm16.6 mm
Height105 mm138 mm
Width52 mm62.5 mm
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Scratch-proof glass
ColoursGreyDark Gray, Camouflage
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)—240 px
Resolution (height)—320 px
Pixel density—167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—20.7%
Performance
Chipset—Mediatek MT6261D
Chip maker—MediaTek
Memory
RAM—0.004 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP0.3 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh2,100 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIM—No
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth—2.4
NFC—No
USB—microUSB 2.0
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare