- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C200 Comfort 4G vs 150 (2023)
Funker C200 Comfort 4G vs Nokia 150 (2023)
What C200 Comfort 4G does better (0) and where 150 (2023) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200 Comfort 4G150 (2023)
| C200 Comfort 4G | 150 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 131 mm | −26 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50.6 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 15.2 mm | +6.1 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 106 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than 150 (2023)?
C200 Comfort 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 150 (2023) better than C200 Comfort 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight128 g vs 106 g+20%
- Dual SIMNo · C200 Comfort 4G: Yes
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 15.2 mm+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 15.2 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 131 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Grey | Black, Cyan, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 26.9% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | microUSB 1.1 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
| Software | ||
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
