- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C200 Comfort 4G vs P38 Pro
Funker C200 Comfort 4G vs itel P38 Pro
What C200 Comfort 4G does better (0) and where P38 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Camera2.7
Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than P38 Pro?
C200 Comfort 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is P38 Pro better than C200 Comfort 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh6×
- Main camera0.3 MP vs 13 MP43.3×
- Screen size2.4″ vs 6.8″2.8×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Dual SIMNo · C200 Comfort 4G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | — |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | — |
| Height | 105 mm | — |
| Width | 52 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | Mint Green, Ocean Blue, Night Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | — | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc SC9863A |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 28 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | — | IMG8322 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | — | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | microUSB |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Rear |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Platform | — | Android |
